ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Integrated transcriptomic analysis and machine learning identify immunogenic cell death genes as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a regulated cell death that activates antitumor immunity, yet its prognostic role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate a robust ICD-related gene (ICDRG) signature for predicting survival and characterizing the tumor immune microenvironment in NSCLC. Methods: In this retrospective prognostic model development and validation study, transcriptomic and clinical data from 598 NSCLC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort were used for model training. External validation was performed using three independent Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts [GSE11969, GSE68465 and GSE81089, total n=441 from GSE11969/GSE68465, with GSE81089 providing an additional RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)-based validation set]. Based on 34 literature-curated ICD genes, we identified prognostic candidates through single-cell sequencing analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). An 8-gene prognostic signature based on the ICD-related risk score (ICDRS) was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression and validated with a machine learning (ML) ensemble framework (10 algorithms). Model performance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and multivariate Cox regression. Associations between the ICDRS and immune infiltration or drug sensitivity were further evaluated. Results: The ICDRS model stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different overall survival (OS) in both the training and validation cohorts (all log-rank P<0.05). The model demonstrated robust predictive accuracy for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival [area under the curve (AUC) >0.70]. Multivariate analysis confirmed the ICDRS as an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) >2.0, P<0.001]. Notably, consistent prognostic performance was observed across microarray-based (GSE11969/GSE68465) and RNA-seq-based (GSE81089) platforms, underscoring the signature's robustness to technical variations. Furthermore, the high-risk group was characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment and higher predicted resistance to common chemotherapeutic agents. Conclusions: We developed and validated an 8-gene ICD-related signature that serves as an independent prognostic biomarker for NSCLC. This model provides insights into the immunogenic landscape of tumors and offers a potential tool for personalizing immunotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.