Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180851›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2026

Diagnostic performances of skin cancers using intensity- and gradient-based features with optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.

Wei Gao, Lingyi Lu, Bingjiang Lin, Suling Xu, Alexander A Moryatov, Sergey V Kozlov, Valery P Zakharov, Dmitry V Kornilin, Ivan A Bratchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei Gao *School of Computer Science, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, China.
Lingyi Lu *Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Bingjiang LinDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Suling XuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Alexander A MoryatovDepartment of Oncology, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Sergey V KozlovDepartment of Oncology, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Valery P ZakharovDepartment of Laser and Biotechnical Systems, Samara University, Samara, Russia.
Dmitry V KornilinDepartment of Laser and Biotechnical Systems, Samara University, Samara, Russia.
Ivan A BratchenkoScientific and Educational Center "Fundamental and applied photonics. Nanophotonics", Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The gold standard for diagnosing skin cancer is the skin biopsy. However, as an invasive method, the skin biopsy might be an uncomfortable process for individuals. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive method capable of providing cross-sectional images of skin tissue. The intensity information in OCT images may encode information related to skin tissues. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore the diagnostic ability of intensity- and gradient-based parameters with OCT in the diagnosis of skin cancers. Methods: This study involved 5 patients with amelanotic melanomas (AM), 8 patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 4 subjects with pigment nevi, and 3 normal subjects. The cross-sectional images were collected using the customized spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT). For each subject, 5 OCT images were used. From the OCT images, 10 intensity- and gradient-based features, and 5 texture features were calculated. Analyses of variance and receiver operating characteristics were utilized to analyze the diagnostic performances of features between study groups. Results: The mean of gradients showed the highest accuracy in differentiating BCC from normal skin tissue [area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) =0.932, sensitivity =1.000, specificity =0.775]. The variance of gradient showed high diagnostic performance (AUROC =0.719, sensitivity =0.700, specificity =0.875) to differentiate BCC from nevi. The highest accuracy was achieved by using the skewness of gradient for distinguishing AM from nevi (AUROC =0.828, sensitivity =0.750, specificity =1.000). Moreover, in differentiating AM from BCC, the skewness and kurtosis of intensity and gradient demonstrated high diagnostic performances. The highest accuracy was achieved by using the skewness and kurtosis of intensity (AUROC =0.900, sensitivity =0.875, specificity =1.000). Conclusions: Our findings have suggested that intensity- and gradient-based features could capture subtle interface irregularities and optical homogeneity for classifying skin cancers.

Indexed as

gradient-based featuresIntensity-based featuresoptical coherence tomography (OCT)skin cancer

Identifiers

PMID42180851
PMCPMC13190907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.