ArticleCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2026
Asynchrony index modified: An improved tool for estimating the quality of patient-ventilator interaction.
Article in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-ventilator asynchronies are a common occurrence among patients receiving ventilatory support. Their clinical relevance has been explored for decades, most often through the Asynchrony Index, a simple and widely applicable tool. However, this index, it seems, may have some limitations and might not fully capture recent advances in understanding ventilatory asynchronies. Methods: Propose a novel index, the Asynchrony Index Modified (AIM), as an alternative conceptual approach intended to better reflect current understanding in this field. This index incorporates additional dimensions, including the type, intensity, and duration of asynchrony events, which could allow for a more nuanced estimation of the overall burden of patient-ventilator mismatch. Results: The AIM is conceived as a practical, non-invasive, and reproducible tool that can be applied at the bedside. The AIM could be quantified and may provide a complementary approach for exploring differences between distinct types of patient-ventilator asynchrony, with possible variation according to exposure time and asynchrony intensity. Conclusion: The AIM is consistent with the principles of precision mechanical ventilation and may represent a step forward in adapting assessment strategies to the evolving understanding of patient-ventilator asynchronies. However, it is important to consider that this proposal is based on a conceptual model, and further research may be necessary to evaluate the AIM, explore its clinical applicability, and establish clinically relevant cutoff values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.