ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
From body composition to reflux esophagitis: an interpretable machine learning model based on CT-derived features.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been increasing in China. Previous studies link sarcopenia and visceral adiposity to GERD, but most models lack CT-based body composition data. This study aims to improve the identification of Reflux esophagitis (RE) by applying machine learning (ML) to third lumbar vertebra cross-sectional CT (L3-CT) images for quantitative analysis of muscle and fat mass. Methods: Participants underwent comprehensive abdominal CT and gastroscopy. Body composition parameters, including skeletal muscle mass (SM), total fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), were derived from the L3-CT images. Six ML models were developed: Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the RF model. Results: A total of 324 subjects were included, with 135 diagnosed with RE. The prevalence of low skeletal muscle mass index (low SMI) was significantly higher in the RE group compared to controls (52.6% vs. 36.5%, Conclusion: This study reveals a significant association between low SMI and RE. ML models identified key body composition factors, providing insights for targeted screening and clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.