ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
The protective model of myofascial trigger points: a testable systems-level framework based on strain-repair mismatch.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myofascial trigger points (MTPs) are frequently identified in clinical practice, yet their underlying physiology remains conceptually fragmented across biochemical, mechanical, and neurophysiological domains. Commonly reported features, including spontaneous electrical activity, increased stiffness, nociceptive sensitization, hypoxia, and elevated inflammatory mediators, are well documented but are not consistently interpreted within established frameworks of tissue stress and repair biology. This paper proposes a systems-level integrative framework, the Protective Model of Myofascial Trigger Points, which conceptualizes MTPs as localized tissue responses emerging when cumulative mechanical strain exceeds local repair capacity. Within this model, increased stiffness, sustained motor endplate activity, nociceptive sensitization, and localized neuroimmune signaling are interpreted as coordinated responses to strain-repair imbalance rather than independent pathological abnormalities. Variability in clinical presentation, including atent and active classifications, is proposed to reflect differences in the magnitude and duration of mechanical overload rather than biologically distinct entities, with persistent MTPs representing indicators of unresolved load-recovery mismatch. Eight falsifiable predictions are outlined, addressing load modification, recurrence patterns, elastographic stiffness, electromyographic behavior, biochemical signatures, and temporal resolution dynamics, providing explicit criteria for empirical testing. By situating MTP-associated phenomena within established principles of tissue injury, repair, and neuromuscular stress physiology, the Protective Model offers a coherent framework to guide systematic experimental investigation of MTP formation, persistence, and resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.