Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180795›Full record

ArticleGlobal heart2026

Stakeholders Want a Menu of Choices: Findings from a Consultation Workshop on Improving Access to Secondary Prophylaxis of Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease.

Thel K Hla, Stephanie L Enkel, Joseph Kado, Elizabeth Eadie-Mirams, Rosemary Wyber, Jonathan Carapetis, Laurens Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thel K HlaWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-4438
Stephanie L EnkelWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-0781
Joseph KadoWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-4397
Elizabeth Eadie-MiramsWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Rosemary WyberWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3904-9269
Jonathan CarapetisWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-9792
Laurens ManningWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-5351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intramuscular (IM) injection of benzathine benzylpenicillin G (BPG) forms the cornerstone of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) secondary prophylaxis. BPG is available as either a low-cost powdered formulation or a costlier pre-filled suspension. Most of the global RHD burden lies in low- and middle-income countries, which rely on the powdered formulation. Prospects of achieving RHD control targets continue to be hindered by global BPG supply issues. Guided by a preliminary consultation of global stakeholders published in 2016 which outlined the desired characteristics and changes to the existing BPG product, much progress has been made in improving tolerability of BPG for ARF/RHD secondary prophylaxis. A second stakeholder consultation of experts and consumer representatives was convened during the World Congress on Rheumatic Heart Disease in Abu Dhabi, UAE, in November 2023 with the objective of evaluating alternate delivery models and the need for new BPG formulations. Topics explored included current barriers and enablers to local secondary prophylaxis uptake, desired changes to the delivery model and ways to improve access to secondary prophylaxis in resource-limited settings. Our findings highlight inadequacies of the current one-size-fits-all approach and the need for education, access to health systems and personnel as well as flexibility and adaptability to meet individual and community needs for effective programme delivery while new and improved BPG formulations, which will overcome current barriers, are eagerly awaited.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHealth Services AccessibilityPenicillin G BenzathineRheumatic FeverRheumatic Heart DiseaseSecondary PreventionHumansInjections, IntramuscularAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin G Benzathinebenzathine benzylpenicillin (BPG)consumer perspectivepenicillinrheumatic feverrheumatic heart diseasesecondary prophylaxisstakeholder perspective

Identifiers

PMID42180795
PMCPMC13196686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.