ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Case Report: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation for electroacupuncture combined with moxibustion in the treatment of recalcitrant low anterior resection syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Approximately 60-80% of rectal cancer patients develop low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following sphincter-preserving surgery, which significantly impacts their quality of life. Existing treatments have various limitations. This case report evaluated the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) combined with moxibustion therapy for refractory LARS using a combined quantitative and qualitative approach. The patient was a 55-year-old man who continued to experience severe symptoms (LARS score: 34 points) 8 years after rectal cancer surgery, with sacral nerve modulation treatment proving ineffective. Case presentation: The patient received EA and moxibustion treatment between 5 December 2024 and 27 December 2024. EA was administered every other day (12 sessions total), targeting the bilateral sacral foramen acupoints: Shangliao (BL31), Ciliao (BL32), Zhongliao (BL33), and Xialiao (BL34). Electrical stimulation lasted 30 min per session with a continuous wave at 50 Hz. Daily moxibustion (23 sessions total) was applied to Shenshu (BL23) and Mingmen (DU4) to warm the kidneys and strengthen the yang. Moxa sticks (30 mm diameter) were held 2 cm above the skin for 45 min per session. After treatment, the LARS score decreased to 11. Daily defecation frequency reduced from 13-15 to 3-4 episodes. Qualitative interview results showed that urgency tolerance increased (from <1 min to 10 min), fecal leakage frequency decreased (from ≥1 daily to <1 weekly), and there was improvement in evacuation difficulties and flatus control. Systemic symptoms (cold extremities, abdominal distension) improved. However, therapeutic effects partially relapsed at 3 months and stabilized at minor LARS levels (score 24) through 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: By combining quantitative and qualitative outcome assessments, this case report offers initial evidence for short-term symptom management in refractory LARS. High-quality research is still needed to fully assess the efficacy of this treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.