ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Associations of a nursing care bundle with clinical outcomes in patients with severe burns and inhalation injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the associations of a comprehensive nursing care bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with severe burns and inhalation injury. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 130 patients admitted to a burn ICU from July 2022 to December 2024. Patients were divided into a Comprehensive Care Group (Group A, Results: Group A was associated with lower rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection (1.6% vs. 11.3%, Conclusion: In patients with severe burns complicated by inhalation injury, implementation of the diversified bundled nursing strategy was associated with improved clinical outcomes and appeared to be safe in this retrospective cohort. However, because of the retrospective design and potential residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted with caution and should not be considered definitive evidence of causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.