SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Core acupoint selection strategies and multifactorial analysis for acute musculoskeletal pain.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to synthesize research hotspots in acute musculoskeletal pain, elucidate strategies for core acupoint selection and their related factors, and provide evidence-based references for clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across eight Chinese and English databases up to October 15, 2025, to identify clinical studies utilizing 1-3 acupoints for treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain (AMP). CiteSpace was applied for bibliometric and visualization analyses, extracting core elements for frequency statistics and generating visualization pathway maps based on pain locations. Concurrently, multivariate logistic regression was performed to further explore associations between core elements and specific pain locations. A total of 438 studies were included, including 404 in Chinese and 34 in English. Results: Chinese publications demonstrated a fluctuating trend over time, while the number of English studies gradually increased after 2010. Keyword clustering showed that motion style acupuncture treatment (MSAT) has become a recent research focus in both Chinese and English literature. Descriptive analysis suggested that Chinese and English studies show similarities in diagnosis and lesion location distribution, with distal acupoints predominating and body acupuncture being the most common technique. Chinese studies emphasized hand acupuncture, while English studies more frequently applied wrist-ankle acupuncture. Perpendicular needle insertion was the most prevalent needling angle. Single-point prescriptions were widely adopted. Chinese studies tended to integrate exercise treatment. Regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between ankle pain, low back pain, distal acupoint selection, hand acupuncture, and scalp acupuncture with exercise therapy. Although the English study sample is smaller, distal acupoint selection was consistently correlated with exercise. Further analysis revealed that low back pain and shoulder pain primarily employed distal acupoints, while thigh, knee, and upper limb pain favored proximal acupoints. Low back pain and ankle pain were more often treated in combination with exercise therapy. Conclusion: This study indicated that treating acute musculoskeletal pain with a small number of core acupoints is feasible, and motion style acupuncture is a key technical approach, especially beneficial for acute lower back and ankle injuries. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251155446, identifier CRD420251155446.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.