SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Genetic biomarkers and individual susceptibility in healthcare workers exposed to waste anesthetic gases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: From a precision medicine perspective, this systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on the genotoxic effects of waste anesthetic gases (WAGs) in healthcare workers. It aims to identify robust biomarkers for individualized risk assessment and to clarify the pattern of DNA damage to inform targeted monitoring strategies. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of four databases up to September 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Observational studies comparing genotoxic biomarkers including comet assay parameters, micronucleus frequency and chromosomal aberrations, between WAG-exposed and non-exposed healthcare workers were included. Pooled mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Thirty-three studies were included. Occupational exposure to WAGs (e.g., nitrous oxide, isoflurane, sevoflurane) was associated with significantly increased DNA damage, measured by comet assay scores (MD = 7.58, 95% CI = 5.29-9.86), tail length (MD = 4.21, 95% CI = 0.26-8.15), and %tail DNA (MD = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.24-4.70). Micronucleus frequency was also elevated in both buccal cells (MD = 0.24 per 1,000 cells, 95% CI = 0.13-0.35) and lymphocytes (MD = 3.74 per 1,000 cells, 95% CI = 3.33-4.14). In contrast, the level of total chromosomal aberrations did not show a significant increase ( Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that WAG exposure causes subclinical genotoxic damage, with biomarker patterns suggesting early DNA strand breaks and micronuclei formation are more sensitive indicators than chromosomal aberrations. These findings underscore the need for a precision prevention approach in occupational health: implementing enhanced safety measures and considering biomonitoring programs that utilize sensitive assays for early detection and individualized risk stratification among exposed personnel. Future research should investigate genetic and environmental modifiers of susceptibility to enable truly personalized risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.