ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Case Report: Multimodal treatment for two unresectable intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the bile duct and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct (IPMN-B) is a rare biliary tumor with marked heterogeneity. We report two cases of unresectable IPMN-B, both treated with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (Gemox)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tislelizumab and surufatinib. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), calculated using the longest diameter of the target lesion, case 1 achieved radiographic stable disease (SD) and improvement in laboratory indices after two cycles of HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy, followed by one cycle of maintenance therapy with tislelizumab plus surufatinib. Case 2 achieved radiographic partial response (PR) after four cycles of treatment, accompanied by marked improvement in abdominal pain and cholestatic indices. No severe treatment-related adverse events occurred in either patient, and both remained alive at the last follow-up. To place these observations in the context of existing evidence, we further reviewed the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathological and imaging features, treatment strategies, and prognosis of IPMN-B based on the available literature. These two cases suggest that multimodal combination therapy may have potential value in unresectable IPMN-B, although the durability of response, long-term safety, and the subgroups most likely to benefit still require further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.