ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Transbronchial cryobiopsy is safe for patients with echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary hypertension: a blinded prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bleeding is the most concerning complication of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBCB). Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is frequently treated as a relative contraindication to bronchoscopic biopsy because of presumed excess bleeding risk, yet TBCB specific data is limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective blinded cohort study including consecutive adult patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) referred to TBCB. All participants underwent pre-procedure transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with estimation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (EPASP); bronchoscopists were blinded to TTE results. PH was defined as absent, mild (EPASP 37-50 mmHg) or moderate (51-70 mmHg). Severely elevated EPASP (>70 mmHg) was planned to trigger unblinding but did not occur. Primary outcomes were quantitative bleeding volume, measured by net suction volume, and clinically graded bleeding severity. Secondary outcomes included pneumothorax, hypoxemia, and hypotension. Results: A total of 74 patients were included; 19 patients met any PH definition (EPASP>36 mmHg). There was an insignificant age difference between any-PH and no-PH groups (66.6 ± 13.4 vs. 59.5 ± 13.2 years, Conclusion: TBCB is safe among patients with echocardiographic evidence of mild to moderate PH. These findings should be further studied, yet provide positive prospective evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.