ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Application of the BOPPPS-CBL teaching model in gynaecological clinical internships: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical internships are pivotal for undergraduate medical students transitioning from theoretical learning to clinical practice. However, traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) in gynaecological clinical internships often limits active engagement and the development of clinical competence. This study aimed to evaluate the educational value of integrating Case-Based Learning (CBL) with the BOPPPS model (Bridge-in, Objective, Pre-assessment, Participatory Learning, Post-assessment, Summary) in gynaecological internship teaching, with a focus on its impact on interns' learning outcomes and learning experience. Objectives: (1) To compare interns' theoretical knowledge mastery between BOPPPS-CBL and traditional LBL groups; (2) To evaluate the BOPPPS-CBL model's impact on interns' clinical reasoning, practical skills, and doctor-patient communication; (3) To investigate differences in learning experience, satisfaction, and pressure between the two teaching modes; (4) To provide an effective, innovative teaching scheme for gynaecological clinical internships. Methods: A total of 90 undergraduate medical students who completed gynaecological clinical internships at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between July and December 2025 were randomly allocated into two groups using a random number table: the Lecture-Based Learning group (LBL group, Results: The results demonstrated that theoretical examination scores and Mini-CEX indicators assessing clinical reasoning in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group ( Conclusion: The integration of the BOPPPS model with CBL significantly enhances gynaecological interns' theoretical knowledge, comprehensive clinical competence, and practical skill proficiency, while improving learning experience and satisfaction. BOPPPS-CBL represents an effective and innovative teaching approach for gynaecological clinical internships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.