Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180665›Full record

ArticleChina CDC weekly2026

Automated Monkeypox Identification from Electronic Medical Records Using Large Language Models - Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China, 2023-2025.

Diyang Xue, Ye Ye, Yu Wu, Zhen Zhang, Jianhua Lu, Xuan Zou, Qiuying Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diyang Xue *Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Ye Ye *School of Public Health and Emergency Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu WuShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhen ZhangShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Jianhua LuShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Xuan ZouShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Qiuying LvSchool of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Monkeypox (mpox) is an emerging infectious disease with diverse clinical manifestations that complicate early case identification. Traditional diagnostic methods relying on laboratory confirmation may delay detection during the early stages of infection. Clinical free-text data in electronic medical records (EMRs), such as chief complaints and histories of present illness, contain valuable information for early identification yet remain underutilized in routine surveillance. This study explored an automated approach to mpox identification from EMRs using large language models (LLMs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 239 individuals - 126 laboratory-confirmed mpox cases and 113 non-mpox controls - from multiple hospitals in Shenzhen, China. Free-text chief complaints and histories of present illness were processed using the DeepSeek-R1-14B large language model to extract structured clinical variables. Fourteen clinically relevant features were selected for model development. Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and random forest classifiers were trained on these features, and a Jieba plus term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) approach served as a baseline comparison. Qwen3-14B was also applied for feature extraction as a secondary comparison. Results: mpox cases most frequently presented at fever clinics (55.6%), with considerable variation in care-seeking patterns. Models using DeepSeek-extracted features outperformed those based on traditional TF-IDF representations and Qwen3-14B, with logistic regression achieving the best performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), 0.927; accuracy, 87.5%]. DeepSeek demonstrated high accuracy (96.1%) in extracting relevant clinical symptoms, including fever, rash, pustules, and HIV infection. Conclusion: LLM-based extraction of clinical features from routine text data represents a promising approach for automated mpox case identification and may support future intelligent surveillance and early warning systems.

Indexed as

DeepSeekElectronic Medical RecordsMachine LearningmpoxSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42180665
PMCPMC13191292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.