ReviewJournal of exercise science and fitness2026
Characterizing virtual community exercise programs for people with mobility limitations: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual delivery of exercise programs can overcome barriers associated with accessing in-person programs for people with mobility limitations. Despite the growing number of virtual programs, several gaps remain, including how these programs are delivered and the specific strategies used to engage participants safely. We aimed to describe the intervention and methodological characteristics of virtual community exercise programs for adults with mobility limitations. We conducted a scoping review of virtual community exercise programs for adults with health conditions associated with mobility limitations. Data were summarized descriptively, and outcomes were classified using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. A total of 36 studies were included. Pre-post studies (39%) and randomized trials (28%) were the most common study designs. Studies frequently targeted individuals with Parkinson's disease (31%), multiple sclerosis (11%), and stroke (11%). Programs were commonly group-based (44%), 2 classes/week (47%) lasting 60 min (63%), for 8 weeks (33%). Interventions frequently included strength (44%), aerobic (31%), and balance training (19%), and synchronous delivery (80%) by physiotherapists (39%) using Zoom™ (68%). Safety strategies included guidance for space and technology setup (19%), and pre-session safety checks (11%). A wide range of outcomes were evaluated, most commonly health-related quality of life (44%) and physical function (28%). This scoping review shows that virtual community exercise programs for adults with mobility limitations primarily involved physiotherapist-led, 60-min group sessions delivered via Zoom™, focusing on a combination of strength and aerobic training, and emerging mind-body modalities, and high attendance. Findings highlight the need for larger, well-powered trials with standardized outcomes to support scalability and real-world implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.