ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Health technology design considerations specific to Indigenous Data Sovereignty and implementation science.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing attention to the importance of Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS) in the practice of medicine and public health, especially in the United States. Through a multi-year research collaborative between the University of California, San Diego and the Native BioData Consortium, it became clear that the use of an implementation science framework might guide the design of emerging digital health technologies best respecting the interests and priorities of Indigenous Peoples. In this Case Study, we discuss the integration of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to inform the design of policies, programs, and interventions focused on improving Indigenous health. We explore the movement for IDS from the perspective of contextual concerns raised by Indigenous Peoples, researchers, and their allies specific to the design and implementation of digital technologies primarily in a North American context. We then explain how CFIR, ERIC, and similar resources can be used to design digital health technologies for use in Indigenous contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.