ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Dietary and supplemental vitamin D intake and pain interference in adults with chronic spine-related pain: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Chronic spine-related pain is a leading driver of global disability, yet the role of modifiable nutritional factors in relation to functional impairment remains inadequately characterized. This study evaluated the associations between dietary vitamin D exposure ranking, vitamin D supplementation, and pain-related functional interference among adults in tertiary care settings. Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted at four tertiary hospitals in China, including 698 adults with spine-related pain persisting for at least 3 months. Dietary vitamin D intake was operationalized as a standardized ranking index derived from a semi-quantitative food frequency screener. Vitamin D supplementation was categorized by current and regular use. The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) interference mean score. Given the observational cross-sectional design, analyses were interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. Multivariable linear regression adjusted for confounders including age, BMI, physical activity, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and sun exposure proxies. Results: Higher dietary vitamin D index was significantly associated with lower pain interference in the fully adjusted model ( Conclusion: Higher dietary vitamin D exposure ranking and regular supplementation were independently associated with lower functional interference in this chronic spine pain population. Because the study was observational and cross-sectional, the findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating associations rather than evidence of therapeutic benefit, particularly in higher-risk phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.