Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180538›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2026

Non-viral delivery of genome-editing tools for treatment of genetic disorders.

Jiamin Yang, Yuxuan Chen, Xiaohong Chen, Yuan Ping

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiamin YangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yuxuan ChenCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xiaohong ChenCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yuan PingCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic mutations within protein-coding regions of genomic DNA can disrupt protein structure and lead to hereditary disorders. Genome-editing technologies, particularly those based on clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats-associated protein (CRISPR-Cas), are promising therapeutic tools for correcting genetic abnormalities. To date, viral delivery vectors for genome-editing biomacromolecules have shown numerous promises in treating genetic disorders. However, safe viral delivery for genome-editing components remains challenging, largely due to the immunogenicity of viruses. As an alternative, non-viral delivery systems are emerging as a safer choice and may offer solutions to address the safety challenges. In this review, we first introduce CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing tools and their delivery formats. Then, we outline the pathology of major genetic disorders and both preclinical and clinical approaches for these diseases by therapeutic genome editing, and provide an overview of current non-viral delivery strategies and their potential to overcome existing limitations. Finally, we discuss the current challenges and future outlooks of non-viral delivery of gene-editing components in treating genetic diseases.

Indexed as

CRISPR-CasGene therapyGenetic diseasesGenome editingLipid nanoparticleNon-viral deliverySelective organ targetingVirus-like particle

Identifiers

PMID42180538
PMCPMC13198248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.