ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Promotion of planetary health through climate-sensitive health counselling in occupational therapy-a qualitative interview study in three countries.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Occupational therapy and planetary health are closely linked, as human health is influenced by environmental factors such as climate change. Occupational therapists (OTs) can enhance clients' understanding of climate-related health issues and advocate for health-promoting climate action through climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC). While CSHC has mainly been studied in medical contexts, its implementation in occupational therapy remains unclear. This study explores European experts' perspectives on integrating CSHC into occupational therapy practice. Materials and methods: Six semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapy experts from France, Germany, and the UK. Data were analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz (2018). Results: Experts identified healthy and sustainable lifestyles and co-benefits of climate and health as key topics of CSHC in occupational therapy. CSHC can be integrated into routine healthcare and delivered within established therapy settings as well as settings involving well populations. Barriers and facilitators, including ethical tensions between individual and collective health perspectives and the availability of professional networks and movements, influence its implementation. Discussion: CSHC in occupational therapy can contribute to planetary health by supporting health protection and promotion. However, broader planetary health dimensions, such as human systems and environmental threats beyond climate change, are not yet sufficiently addressed. European perspectives and international collaboration may support the further development and implementation of CSHC in occupational therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.