ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
Referral patterns and requested interventions in a cancer pain e-consult system.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain affects a substantial proportion of patients with cancer and remains undertreated despite advances in pharmacologic and interventional management. Electronic consultation (e-consult) systems have improved specialty access in other fields, yet their application to interventional cancer pain has not been described. Objectives: To characterize the referral patterns and requested interventions of a dedicated interventional cancer pain e-consult platform at a large academic medical center. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of interventional cancer pain e-consults placed through the electronic health record at Massachusetts General Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 30, 2024. Consult orders were identified via structured EHR query and underwent manual chart review. Abstracted variables included demographics, referring specialty, intervention category, mortality status, and days from referral to death. Associations between intervention category and sex or mortality were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: A total of 348 e-consults were included. Mean age at referral was 62 years (SD 15); sex distribution was near equal (49% male). At the time of review, 53% of patients were deceased, with a median interval from referral to death of 148 days (IQR 62-282). The most frequently requested interventions were celiac axis block (24%), spine-related procedures (16%), and opioid management (14%). Hospice and palliative medicine accounted for 53% of referrals, followed by gastrointestinal oncology (12%). Vital status at data extraction differed significantly by intervention category (p = 0.049), with celiac axis block associated with higher odds of deceased status (OR 1.76, p = 0.03) and intercostal nerve block associated with lower odds (OR 0.29, p = 0.04). Conclusions: A dedicated interventional cancer pain e-consult system attracted referrals spanning 19 procedural categories and multiple oncologic and palliative specialties, including a substantial proportion of patients near end of life. These findings suggest that e-consults represent a scalable, low-friction mechanism to broaden access to interventional pain expertise across the cancer care continuum.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.