ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
Cervical medial branch nerve integrity after cervical spine surgery: Considerations for radiofrequency ablation.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-supported, evidence-based intervention for treating facet-mediated neck pain. However, its efficacy may be reduced in postsurgical patients with altered cervical medial branch nerve (MBN) integrity. This review examines how common cervical spine surgical approaches affect MBN integrity and proposes a pragmatic framework for assessing RFA candidacy in postsurgical patients. Anterior surgical approaches typically preserve the posterior elements and spare the MBNs, thereby maintaining RFA candidacy at operated and adjacent levels. In contrast, posterior cervical fusion commonly disrupts the MBNs at instrumented segments due to lateral mass exposure and decortication, making RFA at fused levels unlikely to be effective; however, adjacent levels may remain appropriate targets with careful technical planning. Laminoplasty carries a moderate-to-high risk of MBN compromise because of posterior element dissection and partial facet violation, requiring individualized evaluation using operative reports and postoperative imaging. Minimally invasive surgeries including laminotomy and foraminotomy more often preserve MBN integrity, particularly when facet resection is limited. Successful cervical RFA in postsurgical patients requires a systematic pre-procedural evaluation - correlation of symptoms with facet-mediated pain patterns, review of surgical history and postoperative imaging to determine MBN integrity, and assessment of technical feasibility including hardware proximity and fluoroscopic access. While patients generally remain candidates after undergoing anterior cervical spine surgeries, posterior fusion patients require avoidance at instrumented levels, and non-fusion posterior procedures warrant individualized assessment. This anatomy-based framework may improve patient selection, though prospective validation is needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.