ArticleSports engineering2026
Deep learning approaches for head pose estimation in sports impacts.
Article in Sports engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Videogrammetry can quantify head acceleration events in sport, but because standard datasets lack the large rotations, rapid motion, and frequent occlusion characteristic of sports collisions, the accuracy of modern deep learning pose estimators in this context remains unclear. This study addresses this gap by benchmarking three models for monocular head pose estimation during controlled football headers: a direct head pose regressor, an end-to-end face reconstruction model, and a full-body human mesh recovery model. Ten participants performed linear and rotational headers. Synchronised 1000 Hz infrared motion capture provided ground-truth orientations, while dual 50 Hz video cameras supplied frontal and side views. Model outputs from standardised detections were temporally smoothed and evaluated using geodesic and incremental geodesic error metrics. All models achieved single-digit mean geodesic (4°-8°) and incremental geodesic (<4°) errors. SAM 3D yielded the lowest mean errors (4.59° and 1.99°, respectively) and showed lower sensitivity to occlusion and temporal impact phase. By uniquely comparing head-only and full-body approaches, results demonstrate that modern full-body human mesh recovery models outperform dedicated head pose estimators under the heavy occlusion and dynamic conditions typical of sports collisions. Errors increased for side-view footage, rotational trials, and low facial visibility. These findings support using deep learning, particularly full-body mesh recovery, for semi-automated videogrammetric reconstruction of head acceleration events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.