Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180391›Full record

ArticleBJR case reports2026

Cerebral fat embolism treated with mechanical embolectomy: case report and systematic review of the literature.

Rohan Mudkavi, Tatyana Sarnecki, Ei Ei Phyu, Htet Phyo Than, Veronica Phillips, Naeem Ahmad, Smriti Agarwal, Yogish Joshi, Dilina Rajapakse, Abhishekh H Ashok

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BJR case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rohan MudkaviThe School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, United Kingdom.
Tatyana SarneckiDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Ei Ei PhyuDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Htet Phyo ThanDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Veronica PhillipsUniversity of Cambridge Medical Library, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, United Kingdom.
Naeem AhmadDepartment of Stroke Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Smriti AgarwalDepartment of Stroke Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Yogish JoshiDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Dilina RajapakseDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Abhishekh H AshokDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3636-7253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral fat embolism (CFE) is a rare complication of orthopaedic, cardiac and plastic surgery and major trauma. Mechanical embolectomy has been used as a treatment option for this condition. Here, we described a case report of an elderly woman who developed CFE after a total hip replacement which was treated with mechanical embolectomy with aspiration alone. The patient developed left-sided hemiparesis and abnormal posturing after surgery and a CT angiogram 45 minutes later showed a right M1 embolus with fat attenuation. Mechanical embolectomy with aspiration was conducted to produce a TICI score of 3. No patent foramen ovale (PFO) was found to explain the paradoxical embolism. Subsequently, a systematic literature review on the use of mechanical embolectomy for CFE was conducted, with the databases Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cinahl, and Scopus being searched. The review found 20 cases, 13 of which were treated with aspiration and a stent retriever, and 5 of which were treated with aspiration only. A reduced mortality was observed in the aspiration only cohort compared to the aspiration plus stent retriever cohort, despite both groups having similar age and gender. Among patients treated with stenting, 3 out of 13 (23%) died, compared to 0 out of 5 (0%) patients treated with aspiration alone. Although this difference was not statistically significant, it may reflect a trend worth further exploration, potentially limited by the small sample size. Further registry-based studies and preclinical models are required to elucidate the effectiveness and superior technique of mechanical embolectomy for CFE.

Indexed as

aspirationcerebral fat embolismembolectomystrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID42180391
PMCPMC13198375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.