ArticleBJR case reports2026
Cerebral fat embolism treated with mechanical embolectomy: case report and systematic review of the literature.
Article in BJR case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral fat embolism (CFE) is a rare complication of orthopaedic, cardiac and plastic surgery and major trauma. Mechanical embolectomy has been used as a treatment option for this condition. Here, we described a case report of an elderly woman who developed CFE after a total hip replacement which was treated with mechanical embolectomy with aspiration alone. The patient developed left-sided hemiparesis and abnormal posturing after surgery and a CT angiogram 45 minutes later showed a right M1 embolus with fat attenuation. Mechanical embolectomy with aspiration was conducted to produce a TICI score of 3. No patent foramen ovale (PFO) was found to explain the paradoxical embolism. Subsequently, a systematic literature review on the use of mechanical embolectomy for CFE was conducted, with the databases Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cinahl, and Scopus being searched. The review found 20 cases, 13 of which were treated with aspiration and a stent retriever, and 5 of which were treated with aspiration only. A reduced mortality was observed in the aspiration only cohort compared to the aspiration plus stent retriever cohort, despite both groups having similar age and gender. Among patients treated with stenting, 3 out of 13 (23%) died, compared to 0 out of 5 (0%) patients treated with aspiration alone. Although this difference was not statistically significant, it may reflect a trend worth further exploration, potentially limited by the small sample size. Further registry-based studies and preclinical models are required to elucidate the effectiveness and superior technique of mechanical embolectomy for CFE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.