Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180375›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Gene mutant dosage is associated with prognosis and metastatic tropism in 60,000 clinical cancer samples.

Nicola Calonaci, Eriseld Krasniqi, Daniel Colic, Stefano Scalera, Giorgia Gandolfi, Salvatore Milite, Konstantin Bräutigam, Andrea Sottoriva, Trevor A Graham, Leonardo Egidi and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intricate interplay between somatic mutations and copy number alterations critically influences tumour evolution and patient prognosis. However, traditional genomic analyses often treat these alterations independently, overlooking gene mutant dosage - a key emergent property of their interaction. Here, we develop an innovative computational framework that infers mutation copy number and multiplicity directly from clinical targeted sequencing panels without requiring matched normal samples. Using this approach, we derived gene mutant dosage statistics for over 500,000 mutations across 60,000 clinical samples spanning 39 cancer types. By stratifying more than 20,000 patients according to mutant dosage across multiple oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes, we identified 46 tumour type-specific biomarkers predictive of overall survival. Notably, 13 of these biomarkers across 12 tumour types were undetectable using standard binary mutant/wild-type models. Additionally, 26 biomarkers were recurrently associated with metastatic spread in 10 tumour types, and 20 predicted organ-specific metastatic tropism in 5 tumour types. Alongside confirming known roles for established oncogenes and tumour suppressors, our method reveals, for the first time, gene mutant dosage patterns as independent predictors of prognosis, metastatic potential, and site-specific dissemination across diverse solid tumours. This augmented insight into genomic drivers enhances our understanding of cancer progression and metastasis, holding the potential to foster biomarker discovery significantly.

Identifiers

PMID42180375
PMCPMC13193154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.