Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180269›Full record

ArticleInterventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)2026

Biofilm Formation in Indwelling Percutaneous Nephrostomy Catheters: Luminal Loss and Bacterial Colonization.

Samuel G Savidge, Bo Yu, Elahe Abbaspour, Ahmadreza Badali, Seyed Sina Zakavi, David Field, Peiman Habibollahi, Mohamed M Ibrahim, Nariman Nezami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel G SavidgeDepartment of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA.
Bo YuDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus, USA.
Elahe AbbaspourGhaem Clinical Research Development Unit, Ghaem Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Ahmadreza BadaliClinical Research Development Unit of Tabriz Valiasr Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Seyed Sina ZakaviClinical Research Development Unit of Tabriz Valiasr Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
David FieldDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, USA.
Peiman HabibollahiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.
Mohamed M IbrahimDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, USA.
Nariman NezamiDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Biofilm formation on the surface of percutaneous nephrostomy and percutaneous nephroureteral catheters is presumed to result in luminal narrowing and predispose to infection. This presumption drives clinical practice in varying ways. However, no study thus far has quantifiably characterized biofilm development in percutaneous nephrostomy/percutaneous nephroureteral catheters. Material and Methods: In this prospective study, removed percutaneous nephrostomy and percutaneous nephroureteral catheters were collected from patients undergoing catheter exchange. Catheters were stained with crystal violet and analyzed to assess biofilm deposition on the internal and external catheter surfaces and to quantify internal biofilm thickness. Pre- and post-exchange urine samples were collected from the catheters and analyzed for bacteria and leukocytes per high-power field. Results: A total of 38 catheters were collected (28 percutaneous nephrostomy, 10 percutaneous nephroureteral). Biofilm was present in all catheters and significantly increased with time. Luminal diameter loss due to biofilm (mean ± standard deviation) was 67 ± 17 μm at 0-2 weeks (n = 3), 104 ± 12 μm at 2-4 weeks (n = 4), 149 ± 32 μm at 1-2 months (n = 10), 236 ± 73 μm at 2-3 months (n = 11), 249 ± 39 μm at 3-4 months (n = 7), and 349 ± 8 μm at >6 months (n = 3). Catheter exchange resulted in a reduction in mean urine leukocytes (p = 0.0004) and bacteria per high-power field (p = 0.0061), but not complete elimination. Conclusions: Biofilm forms on percutaneous nephrostomy/percutaneous nephroureteral catheters within a few days after placement and gradually progresses, occupying more than 200 μm of the luminal diameter by 2 months. Catheter exchange results in an immediate reduction in urine leukocytes and bacteriuria.

Indexed as

bacteriabiofilmcatheterinfectionpercutaneous nephrostomy

Identifiers

PMID42180269
PMCPMC13189979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.