ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Effect of temperature, relative humidity, and time on the detection of swine RNA viruses (PRRSV, PEDV, IAV) inoculated onto filter papers.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Filter papers have a long history of use in diagnostic specimen collection and storage, e.g., Guthrie cards, and recently, as leave-in-place environmental samplers in laboratory animal colonies. Paper offers a practical, low-cost solution to sample handling, but there is little data on the effect of temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), and time on target detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of T, RH, and time on the recovery of PRRSV, PEDV, and IAV RNA from 4 paper products under defined environmental conditions. Methods: In Study 1, 4 paper products were inoculated with each virus and subjected to one of 9 combinations of T (5 °C, 20 °C, 35 °C) × RH (< 20%, 40 - 65%, > 75%) for 0 to 7 days. In Study 2, paper products 3 and 4 were inoculated with PRRSV and PEDV and held at 20 °C × RH (< 20%, 40 - 65%, > 75%) for 0 to 28 days. The effect of environmental conditions on detectable viral RNA was determined by RT-qPCR with results normalized to efficiency-standardized Cqs (ECqs). Results and discussion: In Study 1, recovery of viral RNA differed among viruses and by temperature, but paper products performed similarly. In Study 2, both viruses were recovered from both paper products through the 28-day sampling period. However, higher RH (≥ 40% RH) was associated with increased loss of detectable RNA. At < 20% RH, no decay was observed for either virus on either paper. Overall, our findings indicate that multiple paper products are suitable for storage of viral specimens; albeit the optimal storage conditions would include low RH and low temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.