Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180247›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Effect of temperature, relative humidity, and time on the detection of swine RNA viruses (PRRSV, PEDV, IAV) inoculated onto filter papers.

Betsy Armenta-Leyva, Berenice Munguía-Ramírez, Yanqi Zhang, Jianqiang Zhang, Rolf Rauh, Luis G Giménez-Lirola, Jeffrey J Zimmerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Betsy Armenta-LeyvaDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Berenice Munguía-RamírezDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Yanqi ZhangDepartment of Statistics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jianqiang ZhangDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Rolf RauhTetracore Inc., Rockville, MD, United States.
Luis G Giménez-LirolaDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jeffrey J ZimmermanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Filter papers have a long history of use in diagnostic specimen collection and storage, e.g., Guthrie cards, and recently, as leave-in-place environmental samplers in laboratory animal colonies. Paper offers a practical, low-cost solution to sample handling, but there is little data on the effect of temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), and time on target detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of T, RH, and time on the recovery of PRRSV, PEDV, and IAV RNA from 4 paper products under defined environmental conditions. Methods: In Study 1, 4 paper products were inoculated with each virus and subjected to one of 9 combinations of T (5 °C, 20 °C, 35 °C) × RH (< 20%, 40 - 65%, > 75%) for 0 to 7 days. In Study 2, paper products 3 and 4 were inoculated with PRRSV and PEDV and held at 20 °C × RH (< 20%, 40 - 65%, > 75%) for 0 to 28 days. The effect of environmental conditions on detectable viral RNA was determined by RT-qPCR with results normalized to efficiency-standardized Cqs (ECqs). Results and discussion: In Study 1, recovery of viral RNA differed among viruses and by temperature, but paper products performed similarly. In Study 2, both viruses were recovered from both paper products through the 28-day sampling period. However, higher RH (≥ 40% RH) was associated with increased loss of detectable RNA. At < 20% RH, no decay was observed for either virus on either paper. Overall, our findings indicate that multiple paper products are suitable for storage of viral specimens; albeit the optimal storage conditions would include low RH and low temperature.

Indexed as

HumidityPorcine epidemic diarrhea virusPorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSpecimen HandlingAnimalsPaperRNA, ViralSwineTemperatureTime FactorsRNA, Viralenvironmental surfacepaper samplersrelative humiditytemperaturetimeviral RNA stability

Identifiers

PMID42180247
PMCPMC13194447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.