ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Preoperative multimodal CT for selection of acute anterior circulation occlusion stroke patients for mechanical thrombectomy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: By developing and comparing various preoperative multimodal CT-based models to predict prognosis after successful recanalization in acute anterior circulation occlusive stroke, this study aimed to ascertain the prognostic assessment of patients following successful recanalization. Methods: Patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and achieved successful recanalization were consecutively enrolled from Sanming First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University between January 2022 and October 2024. Based on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, the patients were categorized into a favorable clinical outcome group (mRS 0-3) and an unfavorable clinical outcome group (mRS 4-6). Following the identification of statistically significant variables from the analyzed clinical and imaging data, optimal cut-off values were computed. Five multivariate logistic regression models were subsequently constructed: Clinical-Imaging (C-I), Clinical-non-Perfusion (C-NP), Clinical-non-Angiography (C-NC), Clinical-only (C), and Imaging-only (I). Models performance were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with comparisons based on the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Using the Delong test for model comparison and selection, a nomogram of the optimal model was developed. Model performance was subsequently assessed by means of a confusion matrix and 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Of the 131 enrolled patients, 77 (58.78%) were classified into the favorable clinical outcome group and 54 (41.22%) into the unfavorable clinical outcome group. Statistically significant differences were identified in age (59.5 years), preoperative blood glucose (PBG) (7.21 mmol/L), National institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) (18.5), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (7.5), collateral score (3.5), infarct core volume (19.25 mL), and hypoperfusion volume (180.65 mL). The AUCs for the five models were C-I Model (0.851, 95% CI: 0.785-0.917), C-NC Model (0.865, 95% CI: 0.804-0.926), C-NP Model (0.861, 95% CI: 0.798-0.923), C Model (0.713, 95% CI: 0.626-0.801) and I Model (0.772, 95% CI: 0.688-0.855). The accuracy of the optimal C-NP Model was 0.771, and the mean AUC from 5-fold cross-validation was 0.828. Conclusion: The combined model revealed strong predictive power regarding outcomes following successful mechanical thrombectomy. Furthermore, the C-NP Model holds greater practical utility, as it enables clinicians to quickly assess the prognosis after a successful intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.