ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Phenomenology and clinical relevance of minor neurological signs in child neurology and psychiatry.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minor Neurological Signs, also referred to as neurological soft signs, are subtle abnormalities detected during neurological examination that do not meet criteria for major focal deficits. They are increasingly considered indicators of variability in neurodevelopment, likely reflecting differences in sensorimotor integration and maturation of cortico-subcortical networks. This mini review summarizes current evidence on the phenomenology, neurobiological correlates, and clinical relevance of MNS in child neurology and psychiatry. MNS include motor features such as overflow movements, dysmetria, dysrhythmia, and mild alterations in coordination, tone, and balance. Their assessment relies on standardized, developmentally appropriate tools that support identification of distinct patterns of dysfunction. MNS are frequently reported in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions. While not diagnostically specific, they have been associated with symptom severity and functional outcomes. Further longitudinal and integrative studies are needed to clarify their developmental trajectories, neurobiological mechanisms, and potential clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.