ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Tactile force evokes a biphasic BOLD response in ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel Compact Tactile Stimulator with Sensing: Designed for Individuals with a Brain Injury and MRI.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tactile perception is fundamental to how we engage with and interpret our surroundings. While the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is well known to play a role in processing tactile information, lesser understood responses in the ipsilateral hemisphere have been observed. We aim to characterize the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response pattern of ipsilateral S1 to unilateral tactile stimuli. Three stimulus force levels were applied in an event-related design. As expected, we observed an apparent difference in BOLD responses between the contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres. We found differing response patterns between the Brodmann's areas (BAs) within ipsilateral S1. Ipsilateral BA2 had a positive BOLD response similar to that of the contralateral hemisphere. In contrast, ipsilateral BA1 and BA3b appeared to have a biphasic response. That is, those regions had an initial negative response, followed by a secondary positive one. Using multi-echo analysis, we evaluated whether this biphasic response pattern is BOLD related. We hypothesize that this biphasic response is driven by two periods of neural activity. In addition, the secondary (positive) phase was more sensitive to tactile stimulus force level than the initial "negative" BOLD phase. The ipsilateral BA1 and BA3b responses support a previous hypothesis of bilateral sensory gating. This study extends previous research reporting negative responses in ipsilateral S1, suggesting that the response is consistent with a BOLD signal, biphasic, and that the previously overlooked secondary positive phase is actually more sensitive to stimulus intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.