ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Network-based near-scalp personalized brain stimulation targets.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual-specific resting-state networks predict language dominance in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Excessive Censoring Degrades Individual-Specific Cortical Parcellations and Personalized TMS Targets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Personalized Connectivity-Guided Accelerated Brain Stimulation in a Naturalistic Treatment-Resistant Depression Population.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Increased Aperiodic Exponents Track Depression Symptom Severity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) is often used to identify personalized targets for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, existing methods often overlook individual differences in whole-cortex network organization. Furthermore, in some personalized TMS protocols, lower stimulation intensity is used for targets closer to the scalp, which may improve patient tolerance. Here, we develop an algorithm to simultaneously optimize FC and scalp proximity for target localization. We first use the multi-session hierarchical Bayesian model (MS-HBM) to estimate high-quality individual-specific cortical networks. A tree-based algorithm is then used to select the optimal target. With essentially no parameter to tune, our framework may potentially improve generalizability across populations. We compare our approach with existing "cluster" and "cone" algorithms. In two test-retest datasets of healthy individuals from the United States and Singapore, tree-based MS-HBM reliably identifies personalized TMS targets for depression near the scalp. Tree-based MS-HBM targets compare favorably with cluster and cone targets in terms of reliability, scalp proximity, and FC to the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sACC) in new out-of-sample MRI sessions. To demonstrate versatility, the same algorithm identifies personalized anxiety targets without tuning any parameter. In patients with treatment-resistant depression, tree-based MS-HBM targets compare favorably with cluster and cone targets in terms of reliability, scalp proximity, and sACC FC, hypothetically reducing stimulation intensity by 15% and 5%, respectively. MS-HBM also exhibits the best (most negative) electric-field hotspot sACC FC and highest reliability in induced electric fields. Overall, tree-based MS-HBM provides a robust, generalizable framework to estimate near-scalp personalized targets across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.