ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Incidental diagnosis of pseudomyxoma peritonei associated with peritoneocele at MRI defecography: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the setting of pelvic disorders, before the introduction of MRI defecography, conventional fluoroscopic defecography was the gold standard. Compared to this latter, MRI defecography has the advantage of providing a full pelvic study, enabling the diagnosis of any coexisting diseases (i.e. oncological or inflammatory ones) that could be missed on conventional fluoroscopic defecography. We present an incidental diagnosis of pseudomyxoma peritonei causing a peritoneocele detected at MRI defecography. A 60-year-old healthy woman came to a proctology consultation complaining a sensation of pelvic heaviness over the past three months. Proctological examination revealed a soft bulge of tissue in the vagina suspect for enterocele to be included in differential diagnosis with peritoneocele. If a conventional defecography had been performed, in place of MRI defecography, it would show neither a peritoneocele nor the mucinous ascites, delaying its detection and underestimating the severity of the disease. In this clinical case, the choice to perform the MRI defecography instead of conventional defecography has been crucial in diagnosing a severe oncological disease allowing a consequent prompt treatment. This highlights the important role of MRI defecography in the global assessment of pelvic disorders, due to the ability to detect other pelvic pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.