Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180087›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Clinical GBM hybrid artificial intelligence for prescription dose recommendation and outcome prediction after gamma knife radiosurgery treatment: a proof-of-concept.

Jheremy S Reyes, Alexandros Bouras, Ajay Niranjan, L Dade Lunsford, Constantinos G Hadjipanayis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predicting time to local failure after gamma knife radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases using survival machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jheremy S ReyesCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Alexandros BourasCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Ajay NiranjanCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
L Dade LunsfordCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Constantinos G HadjipanayisCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) are heterogeneous, and prescription dose selection remains challenging in previously irradiated brain. A data-driven approach that individualizes dose while providing quantitative, patient-specific outcome predictions could improve counseling and follow-up planning. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study of recurrent GBM treated with GKRS at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (2014-2024) to develop CGH-AI (Clinical GBM Hybrid Artificial Intelligence). The patient-related clinical variables, biopsy-derived markers, and dosimetric parameters were extracted from the medical records. The primary endpoint was local tumor control, modeled as time to local failure. A lesion-level survival model was developed using a Random Survival Forest and internally validated using patient-level grouped cross-validation. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). A connected dose recommendation engine evaluated clinically feasible candidate doses per case and selected the dose associated with the most favorable predicted local control profile. Results: The local control survival model achieved strong patient-level internal validation performance (C-index 0.80; IBS 0.14). Sensitivity analyses incorporating biopsy-derived markers yielded similar performance, supporting robustness of the clinical-tumor-dosimetric feature set. The integrated dose recommendation engine consistently identified prescription doses associated with improved predicted local control while providing interpretable, case-specific local control probabilities and expected local control duration. Conclusions: CGH-AI integrates survival modeling and dose decision support within the GKRS workflow to recommend individualized prescription dose and to predict local control for recurrent GBM, supporting personalized decision-making and surveillance planning.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegamma knife radiosurgeryglioblastomaoutcomespersonalized treatments

Identifiers

PMID42180087
PMCPMC13193911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.