ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: Malignancy-mimicking imaging appearances of hepatic parasitic diseases.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report delineates a noteworthy diagnostic challenge at the intersection of hepatic infectious disease and oncology: The imaging features of atypical focal hepatic parasitic disease can overlap with those of hepatic malignancies, leading to a risk of misdiagnosis. We present a 38-year-old female with a left hepatic mass. Initial contrast-enhanced CT findings were suspicious for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), yet serological tumor markers were within normal limits. Subsequent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) revealed paradoxical tunnel-like enhancement, typically associated with hepatic paragonimiasis. However, the patient had a history of residence in a historically endemic region for schistosomiasis. Definitive histopathological analysis revealed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with eosinophilic infiltration and Charcot-Leyden crystals, no schistosome eggs were identified. Based on positive serology for Schistosoma japonicum IgG antibodies and the patient's history of residence in an endemic region, a presumptive diagnosis of focal hepatic schistosomiasis was rendered. This case underscores that when imaging and serological findings are discordant, broadening the differential diagnosis to include such atypical parasitic infections is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.