ArticleFrontiers in insect science2026
Is this the time to bid farewell to integrated pest management?
Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has been established for over five decades, primarily to reduce farmers' dependence on harmful chemical pesticides. Numerous countries have allocated substantial financial resources towards research, piloting, and scaling IPM initiatives. However, the low adoption rates of IPM underscore a notable discrepancy between its theoretical constructs and practical implementation in agricultural settings. This perspective paper introduces a novel framework, 'Integrated Plant Health Management' (IPHEM), to bridge this gap. The IPHEM concept is developed within a 'push-pull-policy' (3P) architecture, positioning it as an essential component of sustainable crop production rather than merely a tool for pest and disease management. The 'push' aspect encompasses research activities related to discovery, piloting, and scaling IPHEM, as well as stakeholder engagement in its development and scaling. Conversely, the 'pull' aspect emphasizes the influence of consumer preferences and market demand for safe food as pivotal factors for the widespread adoption of IPHEM strategies in sustainable agriculture. The 'policy' dimension outlines the requisite enabling environment, regulatory frameworks, value chains for inputs and outputs, and infrastructure vital for effective deployment. Thus, this paper elucidates the interconnected, holistic nature of the 3P framework for operationalizing the IPHEM approach and advocates a shift away from traditional IPM models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.