ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2026
Short to mid-term outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears in patients with diabetes.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Increased Risk for Subsequent Hip Arthroscopy After Index Hip Arthroscopy.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to report outcomes of patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) at short- to mid-term timepoints comparing these results to a control group of non-DM patients. Data were retrospectively analyzed for patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAI with a history of DM. Patients had completed pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a minimum 2-year follow-up, including clinically important thresholds for hip arthroscopy, revision surgery, and conversion to arthroplasty. Subanalysis was conducted based on glycemic control. Patients were propensity matched to a control group of nondiabetic patients in a 1:3 ratio. A total of 116 patients were included, with 29 DM patients matched to 87 control patients. DM patients displayed significant improvements across all PROs and high patient satisfaction. No significant differences were observed in the sub-analysis. When compared to a control group, DM patients had lower preoperative PROs and reached similar postoperative scores. DM patients had significantly lower patient satisfaction (7.70 ± 2.43 compared to 8.63 ± 1.57 in the control group
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.