ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
Partisan differences in childhood measles vaccination and general refusals: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records in the United States, 1988-2024.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social Identities and Vaccine Exemptions in the United States: The Role of Religiosity, Partisanship, and Vaccine Hesitancy.Journal of community health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccination remains one of the most effective public health tools globally. Yet recent years have seen increasing political polarization around vaccination, particularly in the United States, as well as measles outbreaks among unvaccinated children. Using individual-level data, we characterize the national evolution of parental political polarization in childhood vaccination refusal, timely receipt of a child's first measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) dose, and delay in first MMR vaccination. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, using electronic health records from a primary care clinic registry and voter registration data with representative coverage across all 50 U.S. states, we identify children born from 1988 to 2024 ( Findings: Partisan polarization in childhood vaccine refusals spiked for children born during the COVID-19 pandemic-up to a gap of 9.2 [4.2-14.1, 95% confidence interval] percentage points for children born in 2021-but has been increasing since approximately 2000, with Republican parents more likely to refuse vaccinations than Democratic parents by an additional 0.25 [0.16-0.34] percentage points per year ( Interpretation: This study provides the first nationwide, individual-level evidence linking parental political affiliation to vaccine refusal rates, MMR vaccination rates, and MMR vaccination delays. Despite various data limitations, our finding of the emergence and widening of partisan gaps over time suggests that political identity has become an increasingly important factor in childhood health decision-making. Funding: This research was supported in part by the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.