SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Nocebo effects in long-term health conditions: a systematic review of experimental studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The nocebo effect refers to adverse symptoms triggered by negative expectations rather than active treatment mechanisms. These responses can undermine treatment adherence, increase symptom burden, and reduce clinical effectiveness. Patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) may be particularly vulnerable because they frequently interact with healthcare systems, monitor symptoms closely, and often have prior negative treatment experiences. Despite these important clinical implications, experimental evidence on nocebo responses in LTC populations has not been systematically synthesised. This review evaluated induction methods, symptom domains, and potential moderators to inform strategies for reducing avoidable nocebo-related harm in clinical practice. Methods: The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was preregistered on OSF. MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched to 21 August 2025. Eligible studies experimentally induced nocebo effects in adults with physical or neurological LTCs using verbal suggestion, conditioning, or negatively framed communication. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Due to substantial heterogeneity in induction procedures and outcome measures, findings were synthesised narratively. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, covering chronic pain, asthma, Parkinson's disease, cancer, and dermatology. Nocebo effects were commonly induced through negative verbal suggestion or negatively framed clinical information. Several studies demonstrated increased subjective symptom intensity, alterations in physiological markers, and brain activation patterns associated with expectancy. Evidence was mixed for neurological symptoms. Anxiety and other psychological moderators were measured inconsistently, and outcome definitions varied considerably across studies. Conclusion: Individuals with long-term conditions can show strong nocebo responses across a range of symptoms. These findings highlight the importance of how treatment information is communicated in clinical encounters. More consistent induction and measurement approaches, routine assessment of psychological moderators, and evidence-based communication strategies are needed to reduce unnecessary symptom burden and improve treatment engagement in long-term condition management. Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/nj7yt/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.