Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179898›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Clin-JEPA: A Multi-Phase Co-Training Framework for Joint-Embedding Predictive Pretraining on EHR Patient Trajectories.

Yixuan Yang, Mehak Arora, Ryan Zhang, Baraa Abed, Junseob Kim, Tilendra Choudhary, Md Hassanuzzaman, Kevin Zhu, Ayman Ali, Chengkun Yang and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yixuan YangDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mehak AroraDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ryan ZhangDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Baraa AbedDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Junseob KimDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Tilendra ChoudharyDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Md HassanuzzamanDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kevin ZhuDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ayman AliDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Chengkun YangDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Alasdair Edward GentDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Victor MoasDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rishikesan KamaleswaranDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Sepsis Physiomarkers for Appropriate Risk Knowledge of monitored patients in the ICU (SPARK-ICU)R01GM139967 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KAMALESWARAN, RISHIKESAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Resilience Endotype-derivation through Parsimonious Analysis and causal Inference of Recovery from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (REPAIR-ARDS)R01HL170175 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh Kumar Agarwal, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL170175NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) learn representations by predicting in latent space, as in computer vision; retaining the action-conditioned predictor at inference turns them into latent world models, enabling planning in robotics (V-JEPA 2-AC). Bringing this design to EHR patient trajectories-a predictor that simulates a patient's trajectory in latent space-has not been explored. We use an LLM as the encoder, reading the hourly record as text, avoiding feature engineering and vocabulary harmonisation. But an LLM adapted by supervised fine-tuning does not organise its latent space around physiological dynamics, and freezing it to train the predictor, as in V-JEPA 2-AC, leaves the encoder unaware of the rollout signal: the predictor degrades under rollout. We instead co-train encoder and predictor under one latent-prediction objective, grounding the encoder in the dynamics its predictor must follow. Naïve co-training, however, is unstable: the untrained predictor drags the encoder toward collapse, and the predictor's rollout diverges as its target space moves. We present Clin-JEPA, a five-phase curriculum that stably co-trains an LLM encoder with a latent trajectory predictor on MIMIC-IV. Three evaluations support the design: (1) under 48-hour autoregressive rollout the co-trained predictor degrades least (predictor degradation ×1.06, against ×1.23-1.36 for two-stage designs and ×6.3-66 for curriculum ablations) while the co-trained encoder resolves the progression of patient state most sharply (largest state displacement); (2) the co-trained encoder separates deteriorating from stable patients in its latent space with Cohen's

Identifiers

PMID42179898
PMCPMC13193276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.