ArticleJAAD international2026
Assessment of high- and low-risk histopathologic subtypes of basal cell carcinoma using artificial intelligence and dermatologist evaluation.
Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer, and accurate histopathologic risk stratification is essential for treatment selection. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrate promise in image analysis, yet few studies have evaluated classification of BCC subtypes. Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of a CNN for binary classification of high- Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 1580 dermoscopic images of histopathologically confirmed BCCs were used to train a preconditioned CNN. A test set ( Results: The CNN achieved an AUC of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.81) comparable to the dermatologists (AUC 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, Limitations: Retrospective single-center design and limited metadata for the CNN. Conclusion: CNNs appear useful for binary classification of BCC histopathologic subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.