SynthesisFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Computational predictive processing models of consciousness: a systematic review of non-invasive brain signal analysis in disorders of consciousness.
Synthesis in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The clinical assessment of patients with Disorders of Consciousness (DoC), ranging from the Vegetative State (VS/UWS) to the Minimally Conscious State (MCS), remains a significant challenge in neurology. Gold-standard behavioral tools are prone to high misdiagnosis rates because they depend on overt motor responses, which may be masked by physical impairments. Consequently, there is an urgent need for objective neurophysiological biomarkers to identify residual awareness. Predictive Processing (PP) is a leading theory that views the brain as a hierarchical inference engine. Under this framework, the brain minimizes "prediction errors" between internal generative models and sensory inputs. Neural signatures of these errors, such as the Mismatch Negativity (MMN), provide a window into the brain's automatic modeling of environmental regularities, serving as a proxy for conscious processing. Objective: This systematic review aims to identify and appraise peer-reviewed studies from the past 15 years that apply computational PP models to non-invasive brain signals in DoC patients. It synthesizes evidence for their diagnostic and prognostic utility and identifies methodological hurdles to clinical translation. Methods: A systematic synthesis was conducted on 30 peer-reviewed studies. Data regarding population demographics (total Results: The evidence reveals a transition from simple waveform averaging to high-dimensional decoding of hierarchical prediction errors. Global information-sharing markers effectively distinguish conscious states, while the temporal progression of prediction error signatures in the early stages of coma demonstrates high specificity for predicting awakening. Conclusion: Computational PP models offer a transformative path toward reducing misdiagnosis. Future research must prioritize 24-hour continuous monitoring and multimodal data fusion to translate these theoretical frameworks into viable bedside clinical tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.