Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179873›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

A Community-Up Approach to Improve Health and Wellbeing in a Dutch Neighbourhood. A Case Study.

Leendert J Guijt, Petra C Siemonsma, Arlette E Hesselink, Suzan Van Der Pas

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leendert J GuijtResearch Group Physical Activity, Self-Management and Behaviour Change, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1561-9067
Petra C SiemonsmaResearch Group Physical Activity, Self-Management and Behaviour Change, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3537-5354
Arlette E HesselinkResearch Group Physical Activity, Self-Management and Behaviour Change, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5697-1146
Suzan Van Der PasResearch Group Social Innovation, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6694-4325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This case study describes a novel community-up approach designed to gain insight into the needs and aspirations of both residents and professionals in a Dutch neighbourhood, aiming to enhance health and wellbeing. The Integrated People-Centred Health Care Services (IPCHS) framework served as the theoretical lens for evaluating the findings. Method: A total of 150 residents and 50 professionals from sectors, including health care, social services, and municipal governance participated. Using participatory action research (PAR), researchers explored local needs and aspirations through a variety of methods, including participatory observations, (in-depth) interviews, transect walks, two world café meetings, and desk research. Results: Needs, aspirations, and opportunities were synthesized into an Discussion: This study illustrates the potential of a novel community-up, PAR-based approach, integrating diverse, generative methods to foster meaningful connections among residents and professionals. It also underscores the added value of applied research, particularly the role of University of Applied Sciences researchers as critical allies in engaging residents, local professionals, and stakeholders such as directors and policymakers.

Indexed as

community engagementcommunity-upintegrated careintegrated people-centred health care servicesneighbourhood

Identifiers

PMID42179873
PMCPMC13196685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.