Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179869›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Partners in Recovery: A Case Study of a National Support Coordination Program for People with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness.

Jennifer Smith-Merry, Joel Hollier, Nicola Hancock, Bill Gye, Luis Salvador-Carulla, Kieran Halloran, William Campos, Sebastian Rosenberg

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer Smith-MerryCentre for Disability Research and Policy, University of Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-2652
Joel HollierCentre for Disability Research and Policy, University of Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2965-9004
Nicola HancockCentre for Disability Research and Policy, University of Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-9239
Bill GyeIndependent mental health advocate, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-6685
Luis Salvador-CarullaHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-9866
Kieran HalloranSocial Work Supervisor and Mental Health Services Coordinator, Australia.
William CamposIndependent Community Living Australia, Australia.
Sebastian RosenbergBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3374-8694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Partners in Recovery (PIR) was an Australian Commonwealth Government-funded program supporting 35,000 people with complex needs, who experienced severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI). The program was designed to foster integrated care to address fragmented and missing supports. Internationally it is a rare example of a national coordination program evaluated in multiple local contexts, from multiple stakeholder perspectives. This paper examines factors that contributed to the program's strengths and weaknesses, contextualising this in relation to the limits of subsequent supports. Methods: This case study draws together 30 program evaluation papers, identified through a range of search strategies. Utilising Arksey and O'Malley's review framework we collaboratively developed a synthesis of themes and findings. Results: The support facilitator role was essential to implementation as was organisational environment. As a cornerstone of care for people with SPMI, support coordination required Conclusions: Data from multiple evaluations of PIR demonstrate the importance of care coordination for SPMI which is underpinned by a recovery-oriented key worker, localised approaches and flexible funding. These are key attributes of integrated support which can inform practice and policy development for this group internationally.

Indexed as

care coordinationmental healthNDISPartners in Recoverypsychosocial disability

Identifiers

PMID42179869
PMCPMC13196689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.