Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179868›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2026

Testicular tissue transplantation: from animal models to clinical application.

Ellen De Beer, Ellen Goossens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ellen De BeerBiology of the Testis Laboratory, Research Group Genetics, Reproduction and Development, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7588-3466
Ellen GoossensBiology of the Testis Laboratory, Research Group Genetics, Reproduction and Development, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7601-9689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvery year, approximately 14,000 new cases of childhood cancer are diagnosed in Europe. Chemo- and radiotherapy have improved significantly, leading to survival rates of up to 81% in children. The growing number of childhood cancer survivors has brought increased attention to the long-term gonadotoxic effects of these treatments, with lifelong infertility being one of the most frequent side effects. Consequently, fertility preservation and restoration strategies are actively under investigation. Since spermatogenesis starts only at puberty, pre-pubertal boys cannot benefit from sperm banking. However, as spermatogonial stem cells are present from birth, the surgical retrieval and cryopreservation of pre-pubertal testicular tissue represent a promising strategy to preserve fertility in boys before undergoing gonadotoxic treatment. Pre-pubertal testicular tissue has been cryopreserved for more than 3,000 boys worldwide. At adulthood, the cryopreserved testicular tissue may be used to restore fertility, either through testicular tissue transplantation or spermatogonial stem cell transplantation (SSCT), or through OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of pre-clinical research on testicular tissue transplantation in animal models, and to highlight the initial steps of the clinical application of autologous testicular tissue transplantation. SEARCH

methodsA comprehensive review of peer-reviewed publications on testicular tissue transplantation was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The literature search was limited to English-language studies published between 2002 (the first study on testicular tissue transplantation) and December 2025. The search was conducted using the following search terms: testicular tissue grafting, allotransplantation of testicular tissue, xenotransplantation of testicular tissue, and autotransplantation of testicular tissue. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance. Articles not subjected to peer review were excluded. Studies were included if they involved testicular tissue grafting and reported graft outcomes, such as the most advanced germ cell stage. OUTCOMES: Animal studies have demonstrated that donor age and graft site play a crucial role in the outcome of testicular tissue transplantation. For instance, transplantation of adult testicular tissue usually led to degeneration of the seminiferous tubules, while allo-, xeno-, and autotransplantation of pre-pubertal testicular tissue successfully restores complete spermatogenesis in most of the species. In addition, homotopic engraftment generally provides the best support to restore spermatogenesis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: As a narrative review, the risk of bias in the interpretation of findings cannot be completely eliminated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: These findings support the clinical translation of autologous pre-pubertal testicular tissue transplantation, highlighting the potential to restore fertility and improve quality of life in men who underwent gonadotoxic treatment during childhood. Pre-pubertal testicular tissue transplantation can be considered following thorough risk assessment for patients suffering from a non-malignant disease, as well as for cancer patients with solid and non-metastatic malignancies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors acknowledge financial support from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Strategic Research Program 89). The authors declare no competing interests.

Indexed as

allotransplantation of testicular tissueautotransplantation of testicular tissuefertility preservationpre-pubertal boyspre-pubertal testicular tissuetesticular tissue cryopreservationtesticular tissue transplantationxenotransplantation of testicular tissue

Identifiers

PMID42179868
PMCPMC13191325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.