ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in brain disorders: mechanisms of repair and recovery.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering MSC-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles for Targeted Cargo Delivery to the Injured Spinal Cord.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Intravenous Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Long-Tract Reorganization That Circumvents the Lesion in a Rat Staggered Hemisection Spinal Cord Injury Model.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Microglia-neuron communication in ischemic stroke: from homeostatic signaling to pathological remodeling and therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC-sEVs) have emerged as promising cell-free therapeutics for central nervous system (CNS) disorders including stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), dementia, and multiple sclerosis (MS). MSC-sEVs offer advantages of low immunogenicity, ease of storage, and ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms by which MSC-sEVs have been reported to promote neural repair and recovery in preclinical models, through two convergent categories of action. First, MSC-sEVs exert direct neurorestorative effects, including activation of endogenous neural stem cells via Wnt/beta-catenin and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling, neuroprotection through PTEN/Akt-mediated anti-apoptotic and antioxidant pathways, preservation of mitochondrial function through mitophagy regulation, and promotion of neurite outgrowth and synaptogenesis through cytoskeletal remodeling and growth signaling. Second, MSC-sEVs modulate the injury microenvironment by shifting microglia and infiltrating macrophages toward anti-inflammatory phenotypes through NF-kB pathway modulation, converting reactive astrocytes to neuroprotective states, promoting angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier restoration, and enhancing oligodendrogenesis and remyelination. These effects are mediated largely through the transfer of microRNAs and other bioactive cargo to target cells at the injury site, although the relative contribution of individual cargo components remains to be fully established. We discuss how these actions address the pathophysiology of stroke, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, TBI, and MS, highlighting disease-specific mechanisms and the current gap between preclinical evidence and clinical validation. Finally, we address challenges for clinical translation, including standardization of critical quality attributes and potency assays, route-dependent biodistribution, safety considerations, and dosing optimization. We also discuss engineering strategies for enhanced efficacy, including surface modification for CNS-targeted delivery, source cell preconditioning, cargo engineering, and scaffold-based sustained release systems. Although no clinical trials have yet evaluated MSC-sEV therapy specifically for neurological disorders, the growing body of safety data from non-neurological MSC-sEV trials and the extensive clinical experience with parent MSC therapies provide a foundation for future CNS-focused studies. MSC-sEVs hold substantial potential as a cell-free approach for neurological disorders that currently lack effective regenerative therapies, although realization of this potential will require rigorous clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.