ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2026
Generative AI-Driven CNN Framework for Enhanced Lung Cancer Detection, Prediction, and Treatment: A Novel Approach to Overcoming AI Limitations.
Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative AI-Driven CNN Framework for Enhanced Lung Cancer Detection, Prediction, and Treatment: A Novel Approach to Overcoming AI Limitations.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains one of the most common and deadly diseases globally, necessitating swift and precise detection to enhance patient prognosis. Conventional radiological techniques, including CT scans and X-rays, often exhibit high false positive rates, low sensitivity, and reliance on radiologist interpretation, leading to potential diagnostic inconsistencies. This research presents a generative AI-driven convolutional neural network (CNN) framework aimed at improving lung cancer detection, risk prediction, and treatment planning. The proposed approach integrates deep learning, CNN-based feature extraction, and generative adversarial networks (GANs) for data augmentation, effectively overcoming limitations in AI-powered diagnostics. A dataset comprising lung cancer-patient information, CT scan characteristics, and cancer risk scores was utilized for model training and evaluation. The abstract has been updated to clearly highlight the quantitative improvements, showing an increase in accuracy from 94.5% to 100% and an improvement in AUC from 0.95 to 1.00 compared with existing models. The CNN model extracts crucial features from medical images, whereas GAN-generated synthetic data enhances learning efficiency and robustness. The model was implemented using TensorFlow and Keras, optimized with Adam and trained over 30 epochs, achieving an unparalleled 100% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score on the validation dataset. A comparative analysis with state-of-the-art AI methodologies, including Transformers and hybrid deep learning architectures, demonstrated the superior efficacy of the proposed framework. The findings highlight that generative AI significantly refines lung cancer diagnostics by minimizing false positives and optimizing treatment recommendations. The novelty of this work lies in its unified framework that brings together synthetic data generation, advanced feature extraction, attention-based classification, and a probabilistic risk prediction approach into a single system, an integration that has not been comprehensively explored in existing studies. The ROC-AUC score of 1.00 further validates the model's ability to accurately differentiate between malignant and benign cases. Future advancements will focus on clinical deployment, explainable AI (XAI) for improved interpretability, and integration into real-world healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.