ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Ependymoma Across the Age Spectrum.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In patients with locally recurrent ependymoma, previous data have shown that repeat radiation therapy (RT2) with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) improves disease control compared with focal RT2 alone. This study aimed to report long-term outcomes of adults and children with recurrent intracranial ependymoma, including those treated with CSI. Methods and Materials: In this retrospective, single-institution study, we identified 48 patients treated with RT2 for recurrent ependymoma between 1999 and 2024. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with the start of RT2 as the index time. CSI was prescribed to 23.4 or 36 Gy, followed by focal boost radiation therapy to 54 Gy. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; groups were compared using the log-rank test. Results: The median age at initial diagnosis was 6.5 years (range, 0.8-62.3 years), and the majority of patients were pediatric (83%; aged <18 years) with a posterior fossa (PF) tumor location (67%). Of the 35 patients with available molecular pathology, 23 had PF-A, and 11 had a zinc finger translocation associated fusion. The median follow-up was 9.1 years. Gross total resection of all disease prior to RT2 was associated with better 5-year OS (57% vs 19%; Conclusions: In this single-institution cohort of patients with recurrent ependymoma and long-term follow-up, gross total resection of recurrence was associated with better survival, and locally recurrent patients treated with CSI-RT2 had longer OS. Further work is required to determine the independent effects of CSI-RT2 together with the extent of re-resection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.