ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Privacy-preserving augmentation of structured telehealth activity data in diabetes patients using natural language processing.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes management increasingly relies on telehealth platforms in which patients generate structured and unstructured data. This unstructured data, in the form of free-text notes often contain additional information beyond the structured data. Extracting this information can enhance patient profiles and optimize treatment. In particular, the extraction of physical activity information from these notes is considered important. This study evaluates rule-based/regex algorithms and a locally deployed Mistral LLM for physical activity information extraction and data augmentation, with their performances benchmarked against a state-of-the-art GPT-4.1. Methods: Data from 943 patients collected over 12 years in the DiabMemory system, supplemented by 100 synthetic notes, were analyzed. Patients' privacy was preserved by applying a free text pseudonymization algorithm to all notes and by using locally deployed approaches, thereby avoiding third-party cloud services. Three tasks were conducted: (1) extraction of physical activity (PA) data from free-text notes using regex and a locally deployed Mistral LLM, (2) integration of extracted data with structured activity records using a rule-based approach and the local Mistral LLM, and (3) benchmarking local approaches against GPT-4.1 based on the synthetic notes. Results: Both local methods achieved strong performance in task 1, with minimum F1-scores of 0.84. In task 2, rule-based augmentation (F1 = 0.73) surpassed the Mistral LLM (F1 = 0.37). Task 3 showed GPT-4.1 outperforming the local LLM but not consistently surpassing regex. The rule-based algorithms also required substantially less computation time than either LLM. Discussion: The regex algorithm achieved superior accuracy and efficiency but required extensive dataset-specific development, while prompt engineering for the LLM required less knowledge and the development time for regex exceeded that of LLM prompt engineering. Findings of this work generally align with prior studies but are limited by the rather small test set and use of synthetic data. Conclusions: Local NLP approaches can enhance structured PA data in diabetes telehealth. Rule-based algorithms remain a strong option where computational resources are limited, though future work should validate these findings on larger and more diverse datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.