Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179808›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2026

Psychosocial Health and Quality of Life Among Living Kidney Donors: A Study From a Tertiary Care Center in South India.

Anjana Gopal, Rajesh R Nair, George Kurian, Anil Mathew, Zachariah Paul, P Sivakami, K P Lakshmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anjana GopalDepartment of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Rajesh R NairDepartment of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
George KurianDepartment of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Anil MathewDepartment of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Zachariah PaulDepartment of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
P SivakamiDepartment of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
K P LakshmiDepartment of Psychiatry, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objectives: Although kidney donation has been deemed a safe procedure with low mortality and morbidity, the impact of organ donation on the long-term quality of life is not known in our population. We aimed to compare the quality of life between age and sex-matched living kidney donors and healthy nondonors and to estimate the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and regret among kidney donors. Study Design: Questionnaire-based observational study. Setting & Participants: Adult living kidney donors aged ≥18 years who donated between 2020 and 2024 at a tertiary care center in South India. Predictors: We analyzed the effects of baseline clinical, sociodemographic factors, postoperative complications, long-term comorbid conditions, and recipient and donor renal function on the psychosocial health of living kidney donors. Outcomes: Quality of life and the prevalence of anxiety, and depression were determined using the SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), respectively. Results: Of the 69 included living kidney donors, 57 (82.6%) were female. Post-donation anxiety and depression were seen in 7 (10.1%) donors and 3 (4.3%) donors, respectively. The SF-36 Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores of donors were not statistically different from those of age- and sex-matched healthy donors (46.84 ± 8.72 vs 48.48 ± 7.52; Limitations: The study was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size. Conclusions: The quality of life of kidney donors was comparable to that of healthy nondonors except for a subgroup of donors older than 50 years who had worse quality of life parameters in certain domains compared with younger donors. Overall, living kidney donors reported a positive donation experience, with low rates of regret.

Indexed as

Anxietydepressionliving donorquality of life

Identifiers

PMID42179808
PMCPMC13195617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.