ArticleBiomaterials translational2026
Four-dimensional-printed personalized shape memory NiTi implant for minimally invasive delivery in cavitary bone defect reconstruction.
Article in Biomaterials translational, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant-Derived Bone Substitute Presents Effective Osteointegration in Several Clinical Settings: A Pilot Study from a Single Center.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating 4D printing technology in medical implants offers promising advancements for minimally invasive delivery (MID) and personalized orthopedic solutions. This study presents a 4D-printed shape memory nickel-titanium (NiTi) mesh implant for cavitary bone defect reconstruction, enabling a time-dependent shape transformation. Fabricated through selective laser melting (80 W laser power, 600 mm/s scanning speed, 70 μm hatch spacing, 25 μm layer thickness), the implant can be compressed during implantation and recover its original shape. Micro-computed tomography analysis confirmed high geometric fidelity (D50 = 58 μm), while scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis revealed a uniform microstructure and confirmed the homogeneous distribution of Ni/Ti across the mesh implant. Phase transformation testing showed that the austenite finish temperatures (austenite finish) of the as-built sample and the acid-washed sample were below the 37°C physiological threshold. Compression testing indicated that a force of 156 N was required for 30% deformation, with complete recovery to its pre-defined shape. Clinically, the implant reduced cortical bone fenestration by 20%. Post-operative imaging at 6 and 12 months showed excellent osseointegration and minimal residual cavities. Functional assessments at 12 months indicated excellent recovery, with a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 29. In the present study, the clinical use of the 4D-printed mesh implant demonstrated not only satisfactory osteointegration but also a practical advantage in surgical handling. The shape recovery of the implant from a compressed state to its pre-designed shape allowed for MID and precise fit to the defect contour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.