ArticleResearch in autism spectrum disorders2022
Feasibility of accelerometer technology with individuals with autism spectrum disorder referred for aggression, disruption, and self injury.
Article in Research in autism spectrum disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Technology to Measure the Occurrence of Self-Injury During a Functional Analysis.Behavior modification · 2026Article
- Approaches for Predicting the Occurrence of Challenging Behaviors in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Early Childhood Aggression in Autistic and Non-Autistic Preschoolers: Prevalence, Topography, and Relationship to Emotional Reactivity.JAACAP open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Most research on aggression, self-injury, and disruption in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has relied on caregiver report or direct observation, both of which have limitations. Past studies demonstrate preliminary evidence for direct detection of these behaviors using accelerometers, but additional research is needed to determine the feasibility during actual clinical assessments and times when a therapist cannot be present for direct observation, as measurement during these periods has the most applied significance. Aims: This study addressed these gaps by evaluating the feasibility of accelerometer use with children with ASD and severe aggression, self-injury, and disruption in clinical and home contexts. Methods and Procedures: We evaluated the feasibility of individuals with ASD wearing accelerometers during behavioral assessments following structured habituation procedures. We also evaluated the feasibility of caregivers applying sensors to individuals with ASD in the home setting. Outcomes and Results: Most participants passed habituation and tolerated sensors during behavioral assessments (e.g., functional analyses). Caregivers applied sensors in the home with variable fidelity with wear time duration and data-collection. Conclusions and Implications: The feasibility of using accelerometers with this population is promising and should be explored further in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.